Case Study · Energeia
The lead engine keeps running. We make sure of it.
Energeia's website is a conversion-optimised inbound machine: bilingual architecture, four distinct buyer flows, active SEO, and a growing content programme. When the site slows down or goes offline, so does the pipeline.
12hrs/mo
Saved per month, across a complex multilingual site
99.97%
Uptime over XXXX months
0
Update-related breakages since launch
Before NoDrama
A site this complex needs someone watching it.
Energeia's website was purpose-built for lead generation: four distinct user personas, custom conversion flows, bilingual architecture, integrated analytics and tracking, and a growing blog and insights section. It does a lot, which means there's more that can go wrong.
NoDrama was brought in at launch. Not because something was broken. Because a site running active buyer journeys for enterprise clients can't afford to find out something's wrong after a prospect already has.
The site was designed and built by Pangolin. NoDrama makes sure it keeps performing the way it was designed to.
The honest audit
What we found when we looked.
Here's what the NoDrama onboarding audit surfaced on a site with this level of technical complexity.
No staging environment.
A site with multiple conversion flows going live on every direct update. One bad plugin update can silently break a lead capture form — the kind of breakage that only shows up in pipeline data weeks later.
Bilingual architecture not monitored.
Without regular parity checks, a translation routing error goes unnoticed until a user reports it, which enterprise clients rarely do. They just leave.
Analytics tracking not verified post-launch.
Three tracking tags had conflicts introducing data gaps. Conversion reporting was incomplete from day one. Fixed in week two.
Mobile performance not baselined.
Page load on the heaviest conversion pages — specifically decision-stage content with embedded media — was running at 5.1s on mobile. No alert was configured.
Blog CMS settings still on staging defaults.
Scheduled publishing had not been tested in production. The first scheduled post had failed silently.
The work
What we actually did. Specifically.
Onboarding audit + brief
Full audit across performance, tracking, CMS configuration, security, and backup status. Plain-English report delivered.
Tracking and analytics fix
Resolved three tag conflicts. Verified conversion tracking across all four buyer flows. Established correct baseline reporting.
Performance optimisation
Identified and resolved the mobile performance issue on decision-stage content pages — image compression, lazy loading, and CDN routing. Load time cut from 5.1s to 2.0s.
Staging + CMS configuration
Configured staging. Corrected CMS publish settings. Tested scheduled publishing, confirmed working. Set up bilingual parity monitoring.
Weekly update cycle + content monitoring
All updates staged and tested. Visual regression across 25 key pages, including all bilingual variants. Monthly report on the 1st.
The results
XXXX months in.
12hrs/mo
Saved per month, across a complex multilingual site with active content publishing
Time the Energeia team spends generating leads and building enterprise relationships, not maintaining a website.
99.97%
Uptime over XXXX months
Active buyer journeys stay online, always
2.0s
Mobile load time on conversion pages
Was 5.1s. Fixed during onboarding.
0
Update-related breakages since launch
All staged and tested before going live
In their words
We have a site with a lot of moving parts: multiple audiences, bilingual pages, active SEO content. I don't have time to watch all of it. NoDrama watches it for me. Monthly report, no surprises, everything running as it should. That's exactly what we needed.
[Name TBC]Energeia · XXXX-month client
- 12-hour off-site backups
- 25-page visual regression testing
- 20GB CDN bandwidth
- 60 min/month support
- 12-hour response time
- Priority queue access